Could the next big animal-human disease wipe us out?
The Marburg virus: 'If tourists were tripping in and out of some python-infested Marburg repository, unprotected, and then boarding their return flights to other continents… it was an international threat.' Photograph: Science Photo Library
Astrid Joosten was a 41-year-old Dutch woman who, in June 2008, went to Uganda with her husband. At home in Noord-Brabant, she worked as a business analyst. Both she and her husband, Jaap Taal, a financial manager, enjoyed annual adventures, especially to Africa. The journey in 2008, booked through an adventure-travel outfitter, took them to the Bwindi Impenetrable Forest, home to mountain gorillas. While there, the operators offered an optional trip, to a place called the Maramagambo Forest, where the chief attraction was a peculiar site known as Python Cave. African rock pythons lived there, languid and content, grown large and fat on a diet of bats.
Most of the other travellers didn't fancy this trip, Taal told me. "But Astrid and I always said, maybe you come here only once in your life, and you have to do everything you can."
Inside the cave, the footing was bad: rocky, uneven, slick with guano. The ceiling was thick with bats, big ones, many thousands of them, agitated at the presence of human intruders. Astrid and Jaap kept their heads low and watched their step, trying not to slip, ready to put a hand down if needed. "I think that's how Astrid got infected," he told me. "I think she put her hand on a piece of rock [covered with bat droppings]. And so she had it on her hand."
No one had warned Joosten and Taal about the potential hazards of an African bat cave. They knew nothing of a virus called Marburg, first identified in 1967 and thought to be carried by bats (though they had heard of Ebola, another filovirus). They stayed in the cave for only about 10 minutes. Then they left, visited the mountain gorillas, did a boat trip, and flew back to Amsterdam. Thirteen days after the cave visit, at home in Noord-Brabant, Astrid fell ill.
At first it seemed no worse than flu. Then her temperature went higher and higher. After a few days she began suffering organ failure. Her doctors suspected Lassa fever and moved her to a hospital in Leiden, where she developed a rash and conjunctivitis; she haemorrhaged. She was put into an induced coma, a move dictated by the need to dose her more aggressively with antiviral medicine. Before she lost consciousness, Taal went back into the isolation room, kissed his wife and said to her, "Well, we'll see you in a few days." Blood samples, sent to a lab in Hamburg, confirmed the diagnosis: Marburg. Astrid worsened. As her organs shut down, she lacked oxygen to the brain, suffered cerebral oedema, and before long she was declared brain-dead. "They kept her alive for a few more hours, until the family arrived," Taal told me. "Then they pulled out the plug and she died within a few minutes." The doctors, appalled by his recklessness in kissing her goodbye, had prepared an isolation room for Taal himself, but that was never needed.
The news of Astrid Joosten's death carried far. She was the first person known to have left Africa with an active filovirus infection and died. Back in 1994, a Swiss graduate student from Ivory Coast had recovered. Did any other person, apart from those two, ever pass through an international airport and depart the continent with Ebola or Marburg virus incubating in his or her body? No one of whom the experts were aware. Astrid Joosten's case proved that Marburg could travel in a human, though it didn't travel as well as Sars or influenza or HIV-1. Five thousand miles away, in Colorado, another woman heard the news with a shudder of recognition. She had visited Python Cave, too.
(NaturalNews) Every year, physicians recommend that people get flu shots to bolster their immune system and prevent getting the flu. The ideology behind flu vaccines is that humans are unable to adapt to their environment and must depend on modern technology to survive the seasons. Flu vaccines have been shown to be highly ineffective and toxic for human and animal use.
Vaccines are one of medicine's prized attempt to improve human performance. They use artificial laboratory derived medical technology to produce an immune response within the body in hopes it will lead to a long-term positive anti-body response. The American Medical Association is especially vigilant about requiring those they deem as immune compromised to get the flu shot. This includes infants and children, pregnant women and seniors.
The vaccine ideology is based on the belief that people are created with inferior immune systems that are unable to keep up with the demands of the environment and need modern technology in the form of man-made vaccine formulations in order to bolster immunity.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "The following substances are found in flu vaccines: aluminum, antibiotics, egg protein, formaldehyde, human aborted fetal apparatus (dead human tissue), monosodium glutamate (MSG), and thimerosol (mercury)."
Flu vaccines are directly linked to about a dozen cases of paralysis and brain damage each year. Many researchers believe these flu vaccine cocktails produce delayed reactions and long-term health consequences.
Dr. Hugh Fudenberg, a world-leading immunogeneticist, has extensively studied the effects of the flu vaccine on neurological health. The results of his research indicate that an individual has a 10-time greater chance of getting Alzheimer's disease after receiving five flu shots in the course of their life compared to individuals who have had zero to one shot in their lifetime.
Dr. Fudenberg and other researchers believe the increased risk of Alzheimer's is a result of the combination of mercury and aluminum within the flu vaccine. Individuals with poor blood sugar signaling and weakened anti-oxidant defense systems will bio-accumulate these heavy metals in areas of their brain with repeated vaccine and other environmental exposure.
Scientists take an educated guess
Flu vaccines offer no guarantee of protection due to the wide variety of viral flu strains. There is no single virus that causes the flu and there is no single flu vaccine that protects against all strains. Scientists take an educated guess as to what three of over 300 different flu viruses they expect to have the greatest virulence in the upcoming year. The vaccine is then formulated from these three viruses.
When you get the flu vaccine, your body produces antibodies to three specific strains of the virus. So you basically have a three out of 300 chance (one percent) of being vaccinated for the proper viral strain. Additionally, the viruses are always adapting and may change form by the time you are exposed.
Even if you are fortunate enough to receive a vaccine for the proper strain of virus, it will be useless if your body hasn't produced a full response (which takes two weeks) or if there is too much time (over three months) between vaccine and viral exposure. The virus may have adapted over time to create a structure the body fails to recognize.
The vaccine will also be useless if your body doesn't produce enough of a response or too damaging a response due to high levels of viral exposure and poor immune coordination. The immune system could be acting blindly due to high sugar intake, low vitamin D3 levels, damaged gut lining and upper cervical subluxations among other things.
About the author: Dr. David Jockers owns and operates Exodus Health Center in Kennesaw, Ga. He is a Maximized Living doctor. His expertise is in weight loss, customized nutrition & exercise, & structural corrective chiropractic care. For more information go to www.drjockers.com To find a Maximized Living doctor near you go to www.maximizedliving.com Dr. Jockers is also available for long distance phone consultations to help you beat disease and reach your health goals
(NaturalNews) Eating genetically modified corn (GM corn) and consuming trace levels of Monsanto's Roundup chemical fertilizer caused rats to develop horrifying tumors, widespread organ damage, and premature death. That's the conclusion of a shocking new study that looked at the long-term effects of consuming Monsanto's genetically modified corn.
The study has been deemed "the most thorough research ever published into the health effects of GM food crops and the herbicide Roundup on rats." News of the horrifying findings is spreading like wildfire across the internet, with even the mainstream media seemingly in shock over the photos of rats with multiple grotesque tumors... tumors so large the rats even had difficulty breathing in some cases. GMOs may be the new thalidomide.
It reported, "Scientists found that rats exposed to even the smallest amounts, developed mammary tumors and severe liver and kidney damage as early as four months in males, and seven months for females."
It goes on to say: "The animals on the GM diet suffered mammary tumors, as well as severe liver and kidney damage. The researchers said 50 percent of males and 70 percent of females died prematurely, compared with only 30 percent and 20 percent in the control group."
The study, led by Gilles-Eric Seralini of the University of Caen, was the first ever study to examine the long-term (lifetime) effects of eating GMOs. You may find yourself thinking it is absolutely astonishing that no such studies were ever conducted before GM corn was approved for widespread use by the USDA and FDA, but such is the power of corporate lobbying and corporate greed.
The study was published in The Food & Chemical Toxicology Journal and was just presented at a news conference in London.
Findings from the study
Here are some of the shocking findings from the study:
• Up to 50% of males and 70% of females suffered premature death.
• Rats that drank trace amounts of Roundup (at levels legally allowed in the water supply) had a 200% to 300% increase in large tumors.
• Rats fed GM corn and traces of Roundup suffered severe organ damage including liver damage and kidney damage.
• The study fed these rats NK603, the Monsanto variety of GM corn that's grown across North America and widely fed to animals and humans. This is the same corn that's in your corn-based breakfast cereal, corn tortillas and corn snack chips.
The Daily Mail is reporting on some of the reaction to the findings:
France's Jose Bove, vice-chairman of the European Parliament's commission for agriculture and known as a fierce opponent of GM, called for an immediate suspension of all EU cultivation and import authorisations of GM crops. 'This study finally shows we are right and that it is urgent to quickly review all GMO evaluation processes,' he said in a statement. 'National and European food security agencies must carry out new studies financed by public funding to guarantee healthy food for European consumers.' (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2205509/Fresh-fears-GM...)
That abstract include this text. Note: "hepatorenal toxicity" means toxic to the liver.
Our analysis clearly reveals for the 3 GMOs new side effects linked with GM maize consumption, which were sex- and often dose-dependent. Effects were mostly associated with the kidney and liver, the dietary detoxifying organs, although different between the 3 GMOs. Other effects were also noticed in the heart, adrenal glands, spleen and haematopoietic system. We conclude that these data highlight signs of hepatorenal toxicity, possibly due to the new pesticides specific to each GM corn. In addition, unintended direct or indirect metabolic consequences of the genetic modification cannot be excluded.
Here are some quotes from the researchers:
"This research shows an extraordinary number of tumors developing earlier and more aggressively - particularly in female animals. I am shocked by the extreme negative health impacts." - Dr Michael Antoniou, molecular biologist, King's College London.
"We can expect that the consumption of GM maize and the herbicide Roundup, impacts seriously on human health." - Dr Antoniou.
"This is the first time that a long-term animal feeding trial has examined the impact of feeding GM corn or the herbicide Roundup, or a combination of both and the results are extremely serious. In the male rats, there was liver and kidney disorders, including tumors and even more worryingly, in the female rats, there were mammary tumors at a level which is extremely concerning; up to 80 percent of the female rats had mammary tumors by the end of the trial." - Patrick Holden, Director, Sustainable Food Trust.
Plants contain thousands of natural compounds that science has shown
benefit human health and shield us against chronic diseases ranging from
heart disease and stroke to diabetes, dementia and cancer. There are
still thousands of yet unidentified chemical compounds in plants and
vegetables we consume that likely work in synergy with existing
phytonutrients that provide antioxidant and anti-inflammatory benefits
to promote healthy metabolism and cellular homeostasis.
A research team from Washington State University has published the result of a study in the journal, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
to explain how more than 40 plant-based compounds have been identified
that can turn on genes known to slow the spread of cancer. This is an
especially significant finding because the spread of cancer is most
often what makes the disease fatal. The authors note that this study
reinforces a rapidly growing body of research showing that diet,
nutrients and plant-based chemicals are opening many new avenues of
attack against this dreaded killer disease.
The lead study
author, Dr. Gary Meadows focused his work on how nutrients can prevent
the deadly spread of cancer cells or metastasis, rather than traditional
work based on the prevention and treatment of cancerous tumors. He
commented "There are lots of magic bullets out there in what we eat
and associated with our lifestyle. We just need to take advantage of
those... and they can work together." He focused in particular on genes that suppress metastasis, an area considered an afterthought by many of his research peers in other studies.
Thousands of plant-based compounds promote human health and prevent cancer metastasis
Meadows reviewed prior studies that found a positive correlation
between natural nutrient intake and cancer suppression, and looked to
see when metastasis suppressor genes were turned on or off, even if the
original authors didn't make a direct connection. Ultimately, he
documented dozens of substances affecting the metastasis suppressor
genes of numerous cancer lines.
study identified more than 40 substances like amino acids, vitamin D,
ginseng extract, the tomato carotenoid lycopene, the turmeric component
curcumin, pomegranate juice, fish oil and others affecting gene
expression in breast, colorectal, prostate, skin, lung and other
cancers. Each natural compound was found to act epigenetically, which is
to say they turned metastasis suppressor genes on or off.
Dr. Meadows concluded "These
epigenetic mechanisms are influenced by what you eat... that may also
be related to how the metastasis suppressor genes are being regulated.
That's a very new area of research that has largely not been very well
explored in terms of diet and nutrition." This research provides yet
another vital link between the thousands of natural chemicals and
compounds that exist in the foods we eat, and the importance of eating a
wide variety of different colored fruits, vegetables, nuts and seeds
daily to prevent the development and metastasis of cancerous cells.
NuVive is your #1 Source for Liquid Vitamins and Minerals!
NuVive is a great tasting, COMPREHENSIVE whole-food, 100% plant
derived total nutritional supplement. This proprietary balanced blend
of 100% vegetarian ingredients delivers 211 vitamins, minerals,
antioxidants, enzymes, fruits and vegetables, amino acids, herbs, and
other important accessory nutrients to your body. In fact, NuVive's 211
total nutrients--are more than eight times the amount of the best
selling nutritional supplements in the world. This singular supplement
provides the foundation for your nutritional needs.
Your body was not designed to absorb ground up rocks
and synthetically derived nutrition. Many popular supplements are
exactly that. Your body was designed to derive nutrition from natural
and whole food sources. All natural plant-derived supplementation is
the only way you can absorb what you are consuming in a supplement form.
NuVive is the next best thing to having a 100% balanced diet of
healthy and unprocessed whole foods, and it actually concentrates a
variety of what you need into one convenient supplement.
Offers the Highest Bodily Absorption Of Any Nutritional Supplement On the Market!
500% to 1,000% More Nutritional Availability Than Pills.
Tastes Delicious...No Difficult Vitamin Pills To Swallow.
100% Natural and 100%
Vegetarian and 100% Plant Derived! Beware Of Non-Plant Derived
Synthetic Nutritional Supplements. If it is not plant derived, your
body has difficulty utilizing it.
211 Total Nutrients. By Far the Most Complete and Comprehensive
Liquid Nutrition Formula On the Market.
Helps To Address the Potential Health Threat Of Nutritional Deficiencies.
The Best Value Of Any Comparable Nutritional Supplement
(Liquid Vitamins Or Otherwise)
On the Market.
Incredibly Fast, Easy and Convenient Way To Get All Of the Nutrition You Need Every Day.
Have More Energy & Feel Great...Naturally.
Liquid Vitamin Form Is Much Easier To Take For Infants, Children & Seniors.
Cold Processed: This Manufacturing Process Ensures the Highest Possibly Nutritional
Potency and Integrity. Most Supplements Are Heat Processed Which Breaks
Down and Destroys the Usefulness of the Nutrients.
People wail, cry, and question why him /her, how could this happen to a child? Immeasurable grief.
Yet the answers are quite clear: humans are unknowingly exposed to far too many chemicals on their food, in their water, their clothes – even when buying a new car. That new car smell? Major cancer causing chemicals that have been used to treat the new leather and the rugs in that new car. And people get in and snort it like they smelled a bouquet of flowers.
Food sprayed with chemicals to make them last? Preservatives. At one time, you could not patent food. Yet we now have a patented soybean. Just so Monsanto can profit. This fooling around and injecting chemicals in food has got to stop!
This is why you must demand that food be labeled GMO! Go California!
Even new clothing has been treated with chemicals that can seep into the body and wreak havoc especially in young children. Not to mention the pesticides that are used on your food. What is very interesting is how many people from Monsanto wind up working for the FDA. The FDA is supposed to protect US citizens from poisons, right? Do enough of your own research and the more you learn the more outraged you will become. This is what is meant by the wolf guarding the henhouse. They eat healthy, sure. And you can bet the ranch they don’t eat the food they sell.
Dr Max Gerson, who in 1938 made a startling discovery that his safe natural treatment for cancer patients held enormous promise. He was getting people well by using something that could not be patented – vegetables. At this time in history, a bill was appropriated for 100 million dollars to anyone who could show promise and results in treating cancer. Dr Gerson in 1946 presented 5 terminal cases and 5 additional patients’ records showing his effective treatment and cure of all of these cases. Well, guess what? The Pepper-Neely bill was defeated by four senators who were medical doctors.
Also of note, radio announcer Raymond Gram Swing who was in the room, was as astonished as any of the others and made a broadcast that night detailing these events and Gerson’s effective treatment. Two 2 weeks later, Swing was fired from his job.
The following video is life changing. The angel Charlotte Gerson is still alive and living in San Diego.
Gerson died in 1959, eulogized by long-time friend, Albert Schweitzer M.D.:
I see in him one of the most eminent geniuses in the history of medicine. Many of his basic ideas have been adopted without having his name connected with them. Yet, he has achieved more than seemed possible under adverse conditions. He leaves a legacy which commands attention and which will assure him his due place. Those whom he has cured will now attest to the truth of his ideas.
Dozens of treatments have come and gone and have just as quickly been termed “not effective”. When an individual encounters a pathogen (virus, bacteria, fungus) their immunomodulators in their brain kick in to use and many different self-preservation events occur. One of the first is a fever. Almost all pathogens function best at 98.6, or normal body temperature.
The aspirin companies have convinced the public that a fever is bad. “We’ve got to break the fever” “if it gets too high we could cause brain damage”. And so this is drilled into caring parents’ minds and they immediately freak and start giving aspirin.
The body knows what it is doing and we interfere. Because we have a degree from a prestigious school and a stethoscope around our neck-we know better. But the fever is designed to make a poor quality environment for the germ, and eventually kill it off.
Instead, the aspirin, or Tylenol, does lower the temperature in some cases and the pathogen can now flourish.
The following was written by a medical doctor and comes from The Cancer Prevention Coalition: The verdict is unassailable. The American Cancer Society bears a major responsibility for losing the winnable war against cancer. Reforming the ACS is, in principle, relatively easy and directly achievable. Boycott the ACS. Instead, give your charitable contributions to public interest and environmental groups involved in cancer prevention. Such a boycott is well overdue and will send the only message this “charity” can no longer ignore. The Cancer Prevention Coalition (chaired by the author) in April 1999 formally announced a nationwide campaign for an economic boycott of the ACS .
The American Cancer Society has close connections to the mammography industry. Five radiologists have served as ACS presidents, and in its every move, the ACS reflects the interests of the major manufacturers of mammogram machines and films, including Siemens, DuPont, General Electric, Eastman Kodak, and Piker. In fact, if every woman were to follow ACS and NCI mammography guidelines, the annual revenue to health care facilities would be a staggering $5 billion, including at least $2.5 billion for premenopausal women. Promotions of the ACS continue to lure women of all ages into mammography centers, leading them to believe that mammography is their best hope against breast cancer. A leading Massachusetts newspaper featured a photograph of two women in their twenties in an ACS advertisement that promised early detection results in a cure “nearly 100 percent of the time.” An ACS communications director, questioned by journalist Kate Dempsey, responded in an article published by the Massachusetts Women’s Community’s journal Cancer:
The ad isn’t based on a study. When you make an advertisement, you just say what you can to get women in the door. You exaggerate a point. . . . Mammography today is a lucrative [and] highly competitive business.
The way women are treated when they have a mammography is deplorable. The tender, sensitive breast is jostled around, roughly handled and placed in the device to obtain the x-ray. The already angry area (angry with cancer cells) is now irritated further, enhancing the probability and possibility of cells spreading to other parts of the body.
Not only that, the tumor has a capsule around it. All the rough movement of the breast only helps to disrupt this capsule and enhance spreading or metastasis. Want a little more irritation? Let’s biopsy the area. A needle is stuck into the balloon and cells removed. Don’t you know there will be some leakage of the cells contained in that capsule?
Lung cancer and esophageal cancers too, are extraordinarily lucrative. It is one of the more difficult cancers to treat. There are miraculous stories about using Hydrogen Peroxide in the proper form to treat the body with oxygen.
Madison Cavanaugh has written a book called The One Minute Cure detailing the effectiveness of Hydrogen Peroxide on various health problems. Get the book.
To be clear, Hydrogen Peroxide must be Food Grade, meaning NOT WHAT YOU BUY IN THE SUPERMARKET. You must find food grade at 35% and then dilute it to 3%. What they sell in the brown bottle has preservatives in it and is not meant for internal use.
Cancer despises oxygen. It also loves 98.6. And it loves fatty tissue. It’s nirvana for the cancer cells. Cancer also has a unique capability to do what is called angiogenesis - it makes it’s own blood vessels to bring more blood and more food to feed it’s crazy appetite. It has this appetite because it is making cells at such a rapid pace.
Sugar is perfect fuel for cancer. High fructose corn syrup is a form of sugar that is ideal, as the high mitotic rate (cell division and tumor growth) calls for energy.
So here we have the “perfect storm”- you take a body, make it overweight – eat low quality food with all kinds of chemicals in the food and expose that person to fluoride in water, or vaccinations (additional cancer causing chemicals), air pollution, barbecued food (additional carcinogens) nitrates and nitrites, second hand smoke, etc and voila! You have a good potential to develop cancer.
Not everyone takes the cheese of standard treatment however, because there are alternatives to treating even difficult esophageal cancer as evidenced by this next video:
Tumors – Let’s pretend you were away and when you came home your home was extremely hot. You go to the thermostat an turn on the air conditioner. Nothing happens.
Would you then rip the thermostat out of the wall, thinking, “Well that should fix it”?
Of course not. This is what we do when we cut out a tumor. The tumors purpose just may be a “thermostat” a way to measure the presence of sickness. What if the tumor was only an indicator and not a sign of imminent death?
In so many cases, when treated successfully, there are reports of tumors shrinking and disappearing.
So what we do in America, we cut the tumor out. And the wonderful surgeon tells the family “I think we got it all”. Since cells are so vastly small, how could anyone, even with a microscope know for sure that they “got it all?” There is not a physician on the planet that could know for 100% sure they were able to “get it all”.
As a matter of fact, what if the tumors actually served a purpose and acted as indicators to tell us whether improvement is taking place? After all, unless the tumor is pressing on an airway or blood vessel, why take a chance and cut a person open who is already in a challenged state? And leave them susceptible to infection. Many people die from secondary infections due to the immunosuppresion of their bodies brought on by the side effects of chemotherapy. The radiation kills healthy cells. Cancer does not make hair fall out; radiation does that. And poor appetite causing poor nourishment? Caused by the drugs. So how can a body stay healthy if they are not getting proper nourishment?
This does not have to be. This is exactly where Dr Gerson was going. Take away the irritants (bad food, poor quality fluoridated water, fats, and sugars) and introduce ingredients the body can use to fight with-clean water-a healthy liver-vegetables-nutrients, and proper health can be restored.
This is a small sampling of incredible alternatives to fight cancer. The reason hemp is outlawed? Henry Ford many years ago said we should be using hemp for almost anything you can imagine – more and better use than cutting down all the trees and insulting the earth with mining. Greed is why hemp is outlawed. It is a very powerful solution to a number of health problems.
Rick Simpson in his video Run From the Cure discusses his very effective treatment for cancer-hemp oil.
The suppression of this information is criminal.
Please read Death By Medicine. Gary Null PhD, Carolyn Dean MD ND Martin Feldman MD, Debora Rasio MD, Dorothy Smith PhD
This is not about bad mouthing anyone. There are better things to do with time. It is about exposing the truth. There are many fine, caring physicians. When a person experiences a trauma from an accident, a severe laceration, by all means, of course you require medical treatment. Let’s not mix compassion with profit. Medicine started out based on compassion. First, do no harm, right? We should prevent what we treat? Where are we now? Big Pharma sends their beautiful reps to doctors’ offices to convince them of how they should be getting more people on this drug or that one, despite side effects. It’s for profit and it is deplorable and sad.
Be aware of your rights; don’t be badgered or scared into doing what “everyone else is doing” only to wind up a statistic. Do your research now while you’re healthy. Don’t wait until you are in a crisis mode. Stay healthy. Grow your own vegetables. Drink purified water. Take nutrients. Question authority. And by all means Wake Up World!
Dr. Dennis Antoine
About the Author
Dr. Dennis Antoine graduated New York Chiropractic College in 1983. He opened his office in Ft Lauderdale to treat patients with chiropractic care and nutritional guidance, and started Prevention@Work which focused on helping industry reduce injuries in the workplace. Using ergonomics, or the study of a person in the workplace, he assisted large companies in south Florida reduce their injuries, thereby helping companies save millions of dollars in health care costs. He has been a contributing editor for the Florida Sun Sentinel, The South Florida Business Journal, and ACA Journal of Chiropractic. He has also been a presenter for the American Chiropractic Association, the Florida Dairy Products Association, and Prevention Magazine. He now helps other doctors market their practices, and get the word out about options and alternatives that are safe and effective in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions.
Shawn Siegel fights against the lies told about vaccinations. Here he takes on five myths that are routinely told—and demolishes them.
As Perseus slew the snake-haired Medusa, Shawn Siegel slays the modern myths of vaccines.
by Shawn Siegel, Grandfather and Vaccine Researcher
1. Vaccines are necessary.
Hogwash. Disease—or what we call disease—is what is necessary, for it is the display of the very immune mechanisms that are eliminating an already existing infection or toxicity from the body. Sickness is literally the process of restoration of wellness. Without the ability to get sick, we become hosts to ruminating toxicity and resultant chronic illnesses and autoimmune disorders, the likes of which were never in Mother Nature’s plan: vaccine-induced epilepsy, vaccine-induced learning disorders, vaccine-induced juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes, vaccine-induced autism, vaccine-induced death.
2. Vaccines are a trivial challenge to what children typically encounter and manage every day.
Every vaccine elicits a bastardized immune response, because the route of introduction—intramuscular injection—bypasses the natural route of pathogen introduction, thus bypassing the bulk of the infectious disease immune system. The nature of supposed protection offered by vaccines is thus illusory, as evidenced by the fact that continued shots, called boosters, are required to continue the charade of immunity.
You cannot eliminate risk from life, but the risks associated with vaccines far outweigh the risks of disease.
In kids before the age of two, vaccines are a particularly insidious biological assault, because their newly developing immune systems have a subdued response. Up to the age of two, Mother Nature shuts down parts of the immune response to allow recognition of and familiarity with the body’s own biologics. During that period, Mother Nature assures that the immune system has a chance to learn recognition of and gain familiarity with the body’s own biologics, as well as environmentally-introduced substances such as potential allergens. Via this process, autoimmunity is avoided later in life. The adjuvants in vaccines directly thwart the integrity of that developmental process, and the result is the epidemic of chronic illnesses and autoimmune disorders we are experiencing.
3. The increase in autism rates is not linked to the MMR vaccine.
Multiple studies have shown that the vaccine strain of measles can infect the gut of the MMR recipient, resulting, hardly unexpectedly, in bowel inflammation. In the kids treated by the Royal Free Hospital in London, whose case histories were studied and summarized in the infamous Lancet article—all of whom had severe gastrointestinal problems and autism—what the global press should have trumpeted was the amelioration of autism symptoms enjoyed by the children when the doctors treated their bowel inflammations. A microgram of common sense demands a thorough program of continuing research, which was precisely the conclusion of the authors of the Lancet-published case series.
4. While vaccines are admittedly not 100% safe, serious complications are extremely rare.
There is no evidence to suggest that serious vaccine reactions are extremely rare. Indeed, the evidence is still being gathered, and it suggests that vaccine damage is much more debilitating, and much more pervasive, than the mainstream will allow. In stating that their products are safe, the vaccine manufacturers literally mean that the benefits outweigh the risks, yet by the very definition of clinical trial the mass administration of vaccines to the general public is part of the ongoing research to determine the actual and long-term effects, which constitute the risks. It is thus an outrageous display of contradiction and hubris on the part of the manufacturers to claim their products are safe, and a breach of the public trust for the FDA to license such products.
5. Vaccines work.
No vaccine is safe; no vaccine is effective. For vaccines to be effective, they would have to make you healthier; they do not. They may appear to help lower the incidence of a particular disease, but the price paid is dear. With every vaccination the immune system becomes more and more disjointed in its response to pathogens. The natural immune system is an intelligent, personal, unique river of response. When you contract a disease naturally—almost always either through inhalation or ingestion—the infectious disease immune system, located primarily in the mucosal membranes of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts, responds in the context of your individual metabolism, your history of previous exposures, and the influence of your environment, and accordingly masterminds the two-pronged—cellular and humoral—reaction. Those two components work hand in hand to eliminate the disease, the display of which elimination we call the symptoms of the disease, and it is a concerted effort. Indeed, there is evidence that the humoral response, which is the one primarily elicited by vaccinations, is but a small part of the overall efficacy of the reaction. Those same two components work to provide markedly lowered susceptibility to future exposure to the same pathogen: immunity.
Science cannot duplicate the response of the immune system. It doesn’t know how, nor could it ever know how, since the natural immune response is predicated on a myriad of individual biochemical factors, with a subtlety beyond human comprehension, because it is, in a very real sense, part and parcel of that very comprehension, literally on a gut level. Every vaccine disturbs the integrity of the natural immune reaction. Thus, it is no surprise when the injuries caused by vaccines are so convoluted: chronic illnesses, severe autoimmune disorders such as asthma, rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes, and ultimately the immigration of toxic chemicals, through various weakened defensive immune membranes to the brain, resulting in the neurological damages we see, such as learning and speech disorders, developmental delays, seizures, and autism. There is no proof of this, technically and scientifically speaking—that is, it’s impossible to trace injected vaccine ingredients through the countless molecular changes they trigger and the resultant immune responses—nor is there need for proof; we have the pudding. In the U.S., we have almost 200,000 suspected serious adverse vaccine reaction reported to VAERS, and over 4,000 deaths, while it is common knowledge that those figures represent but a small portion of the actual reactions suffered. We have the grievous picture of infant baby Ian, who suffered a terrible death at the hands of a Hep B shot, and others. No mother in her right mind, after discovering what a vaccine can do, and knowing that science has absolutely no way of knowing or predicting who will react adversely to a vaccine, nor how adverse that reaction will be, regardless of age or history of reaction or non-reaction, would then vaccinate her child.
The problem is that so many have been driven out of their right minds through a combination of a decades-long, unremittent barrage of mainstream fearmongering, and the foolish insistence that we simply need not be bothered with life’s little discomforts. Life’s natural challenges strengthen us; they strengthen our immune systems.
The scenario is much worse—intolerable—in newborns, infants and babies. Mother Nature subdues the immune response in every newborn for up to two years, and for critical reason, to give it time to learn to distinguish the self – the body – and benign environmental substances from threatening substances. This is what allows us to go through most of life without autoimmune diseases. Vaccines contain adjuvants, specifically included to excite the immune system—to trigger an immune system response. Every vaccination thwarts the natural development of the immune system in newborns, infants and babies. Mother Nature, having provided a robust protection against infectious disease in the mother’s breast milk, basically tells the immune system that, once it matures, you have no need to concern yourself with the resident biologics of the body or the peripheral irritants you already encountered—the potential environmental allergens.
A healthy immune system will defeat virtually any disease, sometimes with the assistance of experienced health care practitioners. Even during the infamous 1918 killer pandemic, before antibiotics, there were doctors who treated roomfuls of patients and lost not one to the disease, because of the treatments and procedures they used. That is the positive side of the illusory vaccine controversy; it re-directs us to natural nurture and maintenance of our immune systems and overall health, the unavoidable effect of diet and nutrition toward that goal, natural treatment of illness and the avoidance of pharmaceuticals, including antibiotics unless absolutely necessary, and the relegation to a position of inconsequence the likes of pediatricians who practice coercion in the marketing of and dogmatic insistence on vaccines.
You cannot eliminate risk from life, but the risks associated with vaccines far outweigh the risks of disease.
Shawn Siegel’s radio show, The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust, airs on Sundays, 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Central Time. You can listen by going to Logos Radio Network and pressing the Listen tab. Shows are archived, so you can listen to previous shows or any you might have missed.
Deaths linked to the West Nile virus jumped 35 per cent in the United States over the past week, amid one of the worst US outbreaks of the mosquito-borne disease, officials said Wednesday.
The mosquito-borne disease, West Nile virus, causes potentially fatal complications such as meningitis or encephalitis
As of Tuesday, a total of 118 fatalities have been blamed on West Nile virus infections since the beginning of the year, up from 87 on September 2, the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention said. The number of cases rose to 2,636 from 1,993 during the same time frame, a 32 per cent increase.
"The 2,636 cases reported thus far in 2012 is the highest number of West Nile virus disease cases reported to CDC through the second week in September since 2003," the agency said on its website.
The virus was first detected in the United States in 1993. This year could see a record of cases deemed neuroinvasive, or capable of penetrating the central nervous system – currently 1,405, or 53 per cent, are classified as such.
Two thirds of the cases have been reported from six states – Texas, Louisiana, South Dakota, Mississippi, Michigan and Oklahoma. Forty per cent of all cases are concentrated in Texas, according to the CDC.
The soaring number could be due to a relatively mild winter, an early spring and hot summer.
Other factors potentially contributing to the outbreak are birds transporting the virus and the exploding mosquito population.
First identified in Uganda in 1937, the virus manifests itself in a number of different ways and 80 per cent of the time does not spark serious symptoms.
However, it can also cause potentially fatal complications such as meningitis or encephalitis.
A man by the name of Richard Ciminio was arrested after gnawing on a woman’s head while naked and “screaming like an animal” during a wild neighborhood rampage, according to Pennsylvania state police.
The story linked below from CBS reveals the latest ‘zombie cannibal’ attack to take place across America this year, highlighted by the viral story that took place in Miami, Florida back in May.
With warnings from intelligence expert John Moore that 4 mutating viruses have been spreading across America that were possibly created in a Russian laboratory, one can only wonder if this so-called ‘Zombie Apocalypse’ is biological warfare upon America or a sign of Prophecy as revealed to us by the Bible.
A Doylestown man, who was naked and bleeding profusely, gnawed on woman’s head all while “screaming like an animal” during a wild neighborhood rampage, state police said.
The bizarre incident played out in the early morning hours of September 7th in Hawley Boro, which is in Wayne County, Pennsylvania.
According to investigators, the incident began when 20-year-old suspect Richard Ciminio Jr. parked his car behind a home on Hudson Street, got out and stripped down to his underwear.
State Police say Ciminio then tried to break into a home, but was unsuccessful. Police say Ciminio then took off his underwear and continued down Hudson Street and broke into an unoccupied home.
While inside that home, police say Ciminio walked up to the home’s second floor and jumped out a window, causing severe injuries to his arms and legs when he hit the ground.
Bleeding profusely at this point, Ciminio then encountered two females who were walking down the street.
State Police say Ciminio tackled one of the females, causing injury to her and covered her in his blood. Investigators say Ciminio then “began to gnaw” at the victim’s head while “screaming like an animal.”
The two females were able to escape from Ciminio and call police.
When police arrived, they found Ciminio lying in the roadway, covered in blood and displaying “delusional and confrontational behavior.” Officers eventually were forced to tase Ciminio, but that did not stop his bizarre behavior as police say he punched an EMT, who was treating him, in the face.
Police were able to finally subdue Ciminio and he was taken to Geisinger Community Medical Center for treatment of his severe injuries.
It was not immediately known what, if anything, Ciminio was under the influence of during the frightening ordeal.
Ciminio is facing several charges, including aggravated assault, indecent exposure and burglary, among others.
September 13, 2012 – CONGO - An Ebola outbreak in Democratic Republic of Congo risks spreading to major towns if not brought under control soon, the World Health Organization said on Thursday. The death toll has more than doubled since last week to 31, including five health workers dying from the contagious virus for which there is no known treatment. Ebola causes massive bleeding and kills up to 90 percent of its victims. “The epidemic is not under control. On the contrary, the situation is very, very serious,” Eugene Kabambi, a WHO spokesman in Congo’s capital Kinshasa told Reuters by telephone. “If nothing is done now, the disease will reach other places, and even major towns will be threatened,” he said. The disease has so far struck in the towns of Isiro and Viadana in Orientale province in the north east. In August, 16 people in neighboring Uganda died of the disease, although health experts said the two epidemics are not connected and have blamed the Congolese outbreak on villagers eating contaminated meat in the forests which cover the region. –Terra
(NaturalNews) Back away from the soda drink and no one gets arrested. That is, unless it is properly poisoned with officially sanctioned artificial sweetener. Then - go ahead, tank up because New York City Mayor, Mike Bloomberg is now pushing to outlaw all sugar sweetened drinks over the size of 16 ounces by March of 2013 - but intends to exonerate all artificially sweetened "diet" drinks. Keep in mind that this is the same Nanny State Mayor Mike who just helped pass out free donuts for the city's "National Donut Day" and also issued an official proclamation endorsing this dough-nutty event.
But will this really solve New Yorker's obesity woes? Not even, partly because artificially sweetened drinks are actually worse for your body overall then sugared drinks. None of this ill-contrived plan deals with the real issues of our desperate need for nutrition in our diets and lack of healthy lifestyles with exercise. Making sugared drinks a "whipping boy" is a distraction from the reality that soda drinks are just one small part of the whole problem.
Sodas - Which is worse, diet or regular?
So they are going after the sugared drinks saying they cause obesity. Well, they are right on when they say that sugared drinks contribute to the slippery slope for unhealthy and fat people. But the artificial drinks can be even worse. If you think diet soda is better for your health, think again. The only way you lose weight on diet drinks is by being sickened with the poison - not from some miraculous drop in calories brought to you by chemical companies.
Most diet sodas contain an artificial sweetener called aspartame. Aspartame is made up of aspartic acid, phenylalanine, and methanol and is some 200 times sweeter than table sugar. Dr. M. Adrian Gross, a former senior FDA toxicologist, stated before Congress: "Beyond a shadow of a doubt, aspartame triggers brain tumors" and, "therefore, by allowing aspartame to be placed on the market, the FDA has violated the Delaney Amendment, which forbids putting anything in food that is known to cause cancer... And if the FDA itself elects to violate its own law, who is left to protect the health of the public?"
Aspartame toxicity is often overlooked as a disease even though it has been reported countless times to independent organizations and scientists (Mission Possible 1994, Stoddard 1995). Patient and physician alike presume that worsening conditions are a normal progression of the illness when it can be in actuality, chronic aspartame poisoning. There are over 92 different health side effects associated with aspartame consumption.
Sick on soda
Research demonstrates that soda consumption, sugared or diet, enhances kidney stone formation with their high acidity and radical mineral imbalances. Your body buffers the acidity of soft drinks with calcium from the bones. As this calcium eliminates via the urine, it slowly forms kidney stones.
Easy carbohydrates like high fructose corn syrup put a huge strain on insulin-producing cells in the pancreas. The pancreas responds by secreting large amounts of insulin for the body to process them, placing heavy burdens on the pancreas, taxing its ability to keep up with the body's need for insulin.
Scientific studies provide evidence that soft drinks are directly related to weight gain. Researchers calculate that for each additional soda consumed, the risk of obesity increases 1.6 times.
A miracle solution to sodas - Drink water
People often drink sodas to quench the thirst. But that is probably the worst time to drink soda. Dehydration brings with it low levels of saliva needed to neutralize acids and wash your teeth clean. Drinking a single 330 ml can a day of sugary drinks translates to more than one pound of weight per month.
So, how about some real solutions to obesity... Healthy diet (without sodas and easy carbs), exercise and paying less attention to shills, whipping boys and shell games.
About the author: Craig Stellpflug is a Cancer Nutrition Specialist, Lifestyle Coach and Neuro Development Consultant at Healing Pathways Medical Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ. https://www.healingpathwayscancerclinic.com/ With 17 years of clinical experience working with both brain disorders and cancer, Craig has seen first-hand the devastating effects of vaccines and pharmaceuticals on the human body and has come to the conclusion that a natural lifestyle and natural remedies are the true answers to health and vibrant living. You can find his daily health blog at www.blog.realhealthtalk.com and his articles and radio show archives at www.realhealthtalk.com
In this important video, Alex interviews pharmacist, nutritionist, and cosmetic chemist Ben Fuchs. Ben is the host of GCN’s nationally syndicated radio show “The Bright Side” where everyday he breaks down the different key essential vitamins and minerals that our bodies literally starve for.
Most of the food we eat, because it’s grown in depleted soils and is mostly GMO, has little to no nutritional value. Even if we wanted to, we could never get every essential vitamin and mineral our bodies need through the foods we eat. Nutritional supplementation is therefore incredibly necessary if our bodies are to maintain a healthy state.
The medical profession doesn’t want you to know the extreme importance of taking frequent doses of Vitamin C, the B complex, essential fatty acids, Silver Sol and other trace elements to combat the myriad of afflicting diseases we face.
Since youth, we are conditioned to think medical doctors have the answers to any and all ailments, however, most diseases are commonly due to a lack of beneficial nutrients. Nutritional supplementation is one of the best ways you can take charge of your health and not depend on the doctor. Our best protection is to understand how to use nutritional supplementation.
The tide is turning. When once it was unheard of for a doctor’s opinion to be challenged, today’s patients are getting second and third opinions, seeking out alternative care and pursuing natural, organic solutions to their health issues.
And now the medical system is being challenged by none other than the Chief Medical and Scientific Officer and Executive Vice President of the American Cancer Society. How We Do Harm: A Doctor Breaks Ranks About Being Sick In America by Dr. Otis Webb Brawley, exposes the nasty side of medicine – those things we hear of, suspect, and experience that erode our confidence in conventional medical treatment.
Dr. Brawley shocks us with statistics. Americans are suffering and dying avoidable deaths. America spends 1.5 times as much per person on health care than any other country, yet it ranks 50th in life expectancy and is 47th in infant mortality. He blames unnecessary and unproven treatments on a lack of scientific knowledge and the financial attractiveness of supporting pharmaceutical companies, medical manufacturers and hospital financial targets. This is a shame.
The most significant statement Dr. Brawley makes lies in the attention to treatment of illness rather than attention to promoting health and preventing disease. After all, disease is big business, not to mention job security for many people.
“The triad of obesity, lack of physical activity and high caloric intake (bad diet) is creating a tsunami of chronic disease. If the system persists as is, medical costs will grow dramatically over the next several decades as the number of patients with diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cancer and orthopedic injury dramatically grows.”[i]
America is focused on sick care refinancing, not health care reform. The medical system is bankrupting the economy – the U.S. spends 18% of its money on medicine. The average cost of a health insurance policy for a family of four is $19,400 per year. Much of that cost is born by the family itself as health care benefits are becoming too costly for the employer to provide. In Canada, the government spends about two thirds of that amount providing health care, and citizens complain that their health care needs are not being met. And much of that money is spent on unnecessary and often unproven treatment.
Health care consumers have every reason to be angry. The costs are unsustainable, and most importantly, the well being of every Canadian and American is at risk. Thirty-five years ago, Senator George McGovern criticized the war on cancer, saying that the annual billion dollars provided by the government was being misspent on treatment and ought to be directed toward prevention. ”How can you assert the vital relationship between diet and cancer and then submit a preliminary budget that only allocates a little more than 1% of the National Cancer Institute Funds to this problem?” This statement was made by Senator McGovern at the 1976 U.S. Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs.
Study after study shows that a good majority of cancers are preventable through lifestyle. The upside down spending of 1 to 10% on prevention, giving the rest to treatment needs to be reversed.
Dr. Brawley is not the first prominent medical doctor to challenge the system, though he likely states his case better in the title of his book “How We Do Harm” than have others who have come before him. He’s also making his thoughts known while serving in key leadership positions in his industry. When the medical community starts to take a real, honest look at itself, those of us who have moved to a more holistic, natural way of preserving health take heart.
What can we learn from this? Take responsibility for your own health. Read, research, and challenge what you’ve been told. Seek out information about what you can do to maximize your potential for continued health and long life. Quality nutrition, reduced stress, increased fitness, minimized toxins and maximized nerve supply are the five essentials that will optimize your health. You can live a full life free of illness and disease. Make wise, informed decisions.
What at one time you would only hear in the health food store is no longer a secret. But health care – and your own health – will only change if you do something about it. While breaking from the mold of conventional medicine may not always be easy, getting out of your comfort zone may just be the one thing you need to do to save your own life.
Dr. B.J. Hardick has dedicated his life to maximizing the health and human potential of his community. His health centre in London, Ontario is one of the largest clinics of its kind in North America. In Dr. Hardick’s seminars and care for patients, he teaches and implements the principles of Maximized Living which he has championed his entire life. Learn more about Dr. Hardick’s Seminars.
Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Monday, September 10, 2012
A new study has found that people who received a flu shot before the outbreak of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic were more likely to catch the swine flu virus, a startling discovery given the fact that experts have blamed the pharmaceutical industry for deliberately engineering the pandemic to make huge profits from vaccines.
“Researchers, led by Vancouver’s Dr. Danuta Skowronski, an influenza expert at the B.C. Centre for Disease Control, noticed in the early weeks of the pandemic that people who got a flu shot for the 2008-09 winter seemed to be more likely to get infected with the pandemic virus than people who hadn’t received a flu shot,” reports the Vancouver Sun.
Despite the claim that the link was only related to Canadians who had received the flu shot, Dr. Skowronski was able to re-create the results in ferrets. Giving half the ferrets the 2008 seasonal flu shot and the rest a placebo injection, eventually all the ferrets were infected with the pandemic H1N1 virus.
Despite the results of the experiment, Skowronsk still bizarrely encouraged people to get the flu shot. According to the CDC, the 2009 H1N1 outbreak killed as many as 400,000 people – although others dispute this figure.
Confirmation that the seasonal flu vaccine could very well have been the cause of the H1N1 outbreak or at least helped it spread validates the testimony of experts like former Chair of the Council of Europe’s Sub-committee on Health Wolfgang Wodarg, who in February 2010 told the Alex Jones Show that the pandemic was manufactured by pharmaceutical companies in league with the World Health Organization to make vast profits while endangering public health.
Initial reports that the swine flu bug was a never-before-seen intercontinental mixture of human, avian and pig viruses from America, Europe and Asia prompted theories that the virus could have been synthetically manufactured in a lab.
Wodarg said that governments were “threatened” by special interest groups within the pharmaceutical industry as well as the WHO to buy the vaccines and inject their populations without any reasonable scientific reason for doing so, and yet in countries like Germany and France only around 6 per cent took the vaccine despite enough being available to cover 90 per cent of the population.
Wodarg said there was “no other explanation” for what happened than the fact that the WHO worked in cahoots with the pharmaceutical industry to manufacture the panic in order to generate vast profits, agreeing with host Alex Jones that the entire farce was a hoax.
He also explained how health authorities were “already waiting for something to happen” before the pandemic started and then exploited the virus for their own purposes.
Professor Ulrich Keil, director of the World Health Organization’s Collaborating Centre for Epidemiology, also slammed the swine flu epidemic as an overblown “angst campaign”, devised in conjunction with major drug companies to boost profits for vaccine manufacturers.
Davis said that the wheat we eat these days isn’t the wheat your grandma had: “It’s an 18-inch tall plant created by genetic research in the ’60s and ’70s,” he said on “CBS This Morning.” “This thing has many new features nobody told you about, such as there’s a new protein in this thing called gliadin. It’s not gluten. I’m not addressing people with gluten sensitivities and celiac disease. I’m talking about everybody else because everybody else is susceptible to the gliadin protein that is an opiate. This thing binds into the opiate receptors in your brain and in most people stimulates appetite, such that we consume 440 more calories per day, 365 days per year.”
Asked if the farming industry could change back to the grain it formerly produced, Davis said it could, but it would not be economically feasible because it yields less per acre. However, Davis said a movement has begun with people turning away from wheat – and dropping substantial weight.
“If three people lost eight pounds, big deal,” he said. “But we’re seeing hundreds of thousands of people losing 30, 80, 150 pounds. Diabetics become no longer diabetic; people with arthritis having dramatic relief. People losing leg swelling, acid reflux, irritable bowel syndrome, depression, and on and on every day.”
To avoid these wheat-oriented products, Davis suggests eating “real food,” such as avocados, olives, olive oil, meats, and vegetables. “(It’s) the stuff that is least likely to have been changed by agribusiness,” he said. “Certainly not grains. When I say grains, of course, over 90 percent of all grains we eat will be wheat, it’s not barley… or flax. It’s going to be wheat.
There have been reports from long term statistical surveys (epidemiological) confirming suspicions that those who are vaccinated often don’t do as well with long term health as those who are vaccination free. Vaccine dangers are real, but those in power don’t want you to know about them.
Many of us know this from our own experience. I’m not referring to serious reactions from vaccinations that do occur more often than recognized, such as autism or Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS), paralysis or death. This is just about continuing life without asthma or chronic autoimmune diseases, and fewer flues, colds, and allergies.
Those epidemiological studies bear out the fact that bad health is more common among the vaccinated (who survive) than those not vaccinated – period! The study was reported and peer reviewed in the PLOS One Open Journal at the end of 2009, but has not received much if any public attention.
The Japanese Animal Study
The lab study was conducted at Kobe, Japan’s University of Kobe Graduate School throughout their various health and biology departments. It seems the initial purpose was to understand how autoimmune diseases develop, not as an effort to reveal vaccine dangers and undermine vaccinations.
Mice that were bred to avoid developing autoimmune diseases were injected with solutions that contain antigens. The word antigen combines the two words “antibody generator.” An antibody is a type of immune system protein that battles pathogenic invaders in our blood or cells.
Over the past six years, Ms Botha has been heavily involved and dedicated to using her print and broadcast experience to share information with the public about the potential dangers of the HPV vaccines. She is a member of TruthAboutGardasil and is one of six women who, in March 2010, presented research and data to the FDA on the alarming statistics of Gardasil and Cervarix deaths, injuries and harm in comparison to other vaccines. She was also a founding member and the former Vice President of Public Relations for S.A.N.E. Vax, Inc organization dedicated to educating the public about the safety and efficacy of vaccinations. In March of 2010, Botha was an invited speaker at the British Society for Ecological Medicine Conference in London where she presented science-based information and research on the dangers of the HPV vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix. Ms Botha is currently the Women's Health Freedom Coalition Coordinator for the Natural Solutions Foundation.
Botha claims that foreign DNA is a term of which most medical consumers are unaware. She believes that it is common sense for professionals to question the safety of foreign DNA – otherwise known as recombinant DNA, stating that:
"Even the American Biologic Safety Association (ABSA) has classified recombinant DNA a biohazard and has outlined specific directives on the handling of such contaminants".
Botha says that according to a supporting document written by the Coalition of Vaccine Safety, the presence of dormant and relict viral sequences in the human and other animal genomes has been known for at least 20 years. These include human retroviral sequences that have been identified in live viral vaccines grown in human cells.
She says the document reports that:.
"Rotarix, an orally administered rotavirus vaccine, contained nucleic acids from porcine circovirus-1 (PCV1), virus.1 Since this report, a second rotavirus vaccine (RotaTeq) has been shown to contain nucleic acids from both PCV1 and PCV2, a pathogen in pigs that is associated with wasting and immunodeficiency."
Both of these vaccinations are given to infants to protect them from the rotavirus, a virus that causes gastroenteritis in very young children. The rotavirus vaccine is a vaccination given to infants aged 2, 4 and 6 months.
Botha's research is clearly stating that DNA from pigs is being found in rotavirus vaccine with the potential to cause wasting and immunodeficiency. Yet when evidence of this discovery was presented to the FDA back in 2010 the FDA announced that it was no problem!
The FDA is patting us all on the back and treating us like imbeciles! I want to know just how safe it is to vaccinate very young children with vaccines containing rDNA. Botha believes the answer to my question is easy. According to Botha, the Centre for the Biology of Chronic Disease has published a book which appears to provide us with the answer. She says:
"The Center for the Biology of Chronic Disease" publisher of Dr. Hanan Polansky's the Purple book Microcompetition with Foreign DNA and the Origin of Chronic Disease explains how foreign DNA fragments can cause many major diseases without damaging (mutating) the human DNA. The book has been read by more than 5,000 scientists around the world, and has been reviewed in more than 20 leading scientific journals. The theory explains the underlying cause of many major diseases and shows how dormant viruses actually can cause disease while still latent."
One case could provide us with the evidence to back up this theory.
On August 8, 2012, the NZ (New Zealand) Herald reported that a mother in New Zealand believed the Gardasil vaccine, the vaccination against cervical cancer, was responsible for the death of her teenage daughter.
Ms Renata told reporters that she had found her daughter Jasmine dead in bed six months after she had received her third dose of the vaccination. She added that the year her daughter had received the vaccinations, she had never complained so much about her mental or physical state.
During a coroner's inquiry, Dr Sin Hang Lee, a pathologist on the medical staff at Connecticut's Milford Hospital testified about the discovery of HPV DNA fragments in post-mortem samples of Ms Renata's blood and spleen a full six months after the Gardasil® vaccination.
Ms Botha writes,
Dr. Lee's testimony stated:
"The finding of these foreign DNA fragments in the post-mortem samples six months after vaccination indicates that some of the residual DNA fragments from the viral gene or plasmid injected with Gardasil® have been protected from degradation in the form of DNA-aluminum complexes in the macrophages; or via integration into the human genome."
Botha's paper does not stop at these two vaccines. Her fascinating must-read paper also discusses foreign rDNA being present in the MMRII and the Chicken Pox vaccinations.
According to Botha, a study has discovered foreign human DNA in children with autism. Ms Botha says that in April of 2012, the CBCD published a press release. encouraging the CDC to study Polansky's Microcompetition Theory since foreign DNA has also been found in Merck & Co.'s MMR II vaccine.. The vaccine package insert (available for download at the FDA's web site) shows that fetal cell line Wistar RA 27/3, fetal cell line WI-38, and genetically engineered human albumin are all used in the vaccine.
Botha then says their press releases state:
"The MMR II vaccine is contaminated with human DNA from the cell line in which the rubella virus is grown. This human DNA could be the cause of the spikes in incidence. An additional increased spike in incidence of autism occurred in 1995 when the chicken pox vaccine was grown in human fetal tissue," wrote Dr. Helen Ratajczak, Ph.D. in support of this belief. She published two papers regarding this subject in the Journal of Immunotoxicology. (Merck and Co. Inc., 2001; Breuer, 2003)"
However, human DNA is not the only substance in childhood vaccines being discovered in the bodies of vaccinated children.
Here is evidence of other substances from vaccinations being discovered in the bodies of children.
In Japan, H Kawashima, et al. found evidence of the measles virus in the peripheral mononuclear cells of three of nine autistic patients with inflammatory bowel disease (as well as one of eight patients with Crohn's disease and one in three patients with ulcerative colitis). All the children had been vaccinated with the MMR.
"We studied eight children who had measles at 6 to 10 months of age during the 1998 Argentine measles outbreak and in whom subacute sclerosing panencephalitis developed 4 years later. We report the genetic characterization of brain tissue –associated measles virus samples from three patients. Phylogenetic relationships clustered these viruses with the wild-type D6 genotype isolated during the 1998 outbreak. The children received measles vaccine; however, vaccinal strains were not found."
Although the authors state that they found no evidence of vaccinal strains of measles in the tissue, it is unclear when the children were actually vaccinated. If the children were vaccinated after they had had the measles vaccine this could mean that the vaccine caused the children to contract SSPE. However, if the children had been vaccinated prior to them contracting measles then maybe it was the measles vaccine which caused them to become immune deficient leaving them susceptible to infection.
This Argentinean evidence is in line with the evidence discussed at various meetings of the JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization) which had taken place in the UK during the 1970's, 1980's and 1990's.
Botha's well-documented and researched paper is a stark reminder of exactly what substances the pharmaceutical industries and governments demand that our children need to keep them healthy. However, is it right that our children's bodies are contaminated with foreign DNA and vaccine substances, causing them to become disabled or to end up in a mortuary? In my opinion, these so-called life-saving vaccines are causing more harm than good, but instead of examining these issues more closely, governments are knowingly introducing more and more lethal injections onto the open market.
Many people still assume that hospitals are generally clean, sanitized places where harmful pathogens would have a difficult time surviving. But a new study published in the American Journal of Infection Control says otherwise, having found that nearly half of all hospital rooms tested were contaminated with a deadly, drug-resistant superbug known as Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR-AB).
For their study, researchers from the University of Maryland School of Medicine tested bed rails, tables, supply carts, door knobs, nurse call buttons, infusion pumps, various equipment touch pads, and floors for the bacteria. They found that in 48 percent of rooms tested, nearly 10 percent of surface samples contained MDR-AB.
Leading the pack were cart handles, which were found to be contaminated 20 percent of the time. Floors around hospital beds were second, representing a 16 percent contamination rate. Following these were infusion pumps at 14 percent, ventilator touch pads at 11.4 percent, and bed rails at just over ten percent.
“For patients with MDR-AB, the surrounding environment is frequently contaminated, even among patients with a remote history of MDR-AB,” said the researchers in their journal release. “In addition, surfaces often touched by health care workers during routine patient care are commonly contaminated and may be a source of (hospital-based) transmission. The results of this study are consistent with studies of other important hospital pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Clostridium difficile.”
Because MDR-AB infections typically only take hold in people who are already ill or who have weakened immune systems, those admitted to hospitals have the highest risk of infection. In fact, a 2010 study published in the journal Archives of Internal Medicine found that 48,000 hospital patients die every year from infection with hospital superbugs (https://www.naturalnews.com/028441_s…).
But the solution is not to pump more drugs into patients with the hopes that they will somehow gain better protection from infection. On the contrary, boosting a patients immune systems naturally through improved nutrition and superfoods, for instance, is one way to help them stave off deadly infection.
Another way is to disinfect hospitals naturally with things like copper solution, which has been shown to kill 97 percent of hospital superbugs, rather than conventional chemical solutions that are only increasing the prevalence and severity of existing superbugs (https://www.naturalnews.com/033398_s…).
Vaccines have been a topic of debate for a very long time and as time goes on more and more people are realizing what is becoming the obvious truth about vaccines. There have been numerous articles that have covered vaccines on our website so I will list them below. What I wanted to share today is a video where Rob Schneider is speaking out about why he feels people should have the choice to vaccinate their children. Other vaccine articles:
This is the first of many interviews Alex has conducted with Dr. Peter Glidden. In the video, Dr. Glidden gives an overview of the history of medical tyranny. This program generated a very powerful response when it aired as it puts the medical profession on the spot.
Dr. Glidden’s expansive career as a doctor of Naturopathic medicine has led to the conclusion that the medical model being prescribed by MD’s might actually be doing more harm than good. Society has largely conditioned us to accept medical doctor’s advice and medicine without question, even for minor ailments.
Why have we not been told that nutritional supplementation of at least 200mcg of selenium reduces the occurrence of breast, lung, and colon cancer by 82%? Or that Silver Sol has been shown to kill every virus, bacteria and pathogen ever tested against it and it is completely non-toxic? Medicine in the US is completely controlled by MD’s and MD’s controlled by the pharmaceutical companies.
(NaturalNews) Though all 50 U.S. states recognize the natural human right of individuals to refuse otherwise compulsory vaccinations on the basis of religious, philosophical, or medical reasons -- some states recognize all three reasons as valid -- 95 percent of American parents still go along with the federal government's recommended vaccine schedule for their children with no questions asked.
According to a new report issued by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 93.2 percent of all incoming kindergarteners for the 2011-12 school year were vaccinated with the recommended two doses of chickenpox vaccine, while more than 95 percent were vaccinated for diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, polio, hepatitis B, and the combination measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, the latter of which is implicated in causing autism.
Mississippi, the only U.S. state that does not allow vaccine exemptions for either religious or philosophical reasons -- only for medical reasons -- had a statewide total of only 16 kindergarten vaccine exemptions for the 2011-12 school year, representing a virtually 100 percent vaccination rate. Washington state, on the other hand, which recognizes vaccine exemptions for medical, religious, and philosophical reasons, had a vaccine exemption rate of 6.2 percent, the highest among the 50 U.S. states.
Between the 2009-10 school year and the 2011-12 school year, Arkansas saw the most dramatic increase in vaccine exemptions among kindergarteners with a 650 percent overall increase. Nebraska, on the other hand, witnessed a more than 50 percent drop in vaccine exemptions between 2009-10 and 2011-12.
Politicians, public health officials trying to eliminate vaccine exemption provisions across the country
As more and more parents awaken to the fact that many of the recommended vaccines are extremely dangerous and could cause permanent damage in their children, the vaccine industry via its political and public health puppets is desperately trying to alter or eliminate vaccine exemption provisions in various states across the country.
Public health officials in New Mexico, for instance, recently altered their state's vaccine exemption form to prohibit parents from citing philosophical reasons for refusing to vaccinate their children (https://www.wjtv.com). And officials in California recently passed a bill that requires parents in the state who choose to protect their children against vaccines to first meet with a health care provider so they can be indoctrinated with pro-vaccine dogma. (https://blogs.kqed.org)
As can be expected, most American parents are not even aware that they can exempt their children from vaccines because school officials, public health authorities, and others routinely lie to them and claim that vaccines are mandatory. If more parents knew that they possess an inalienable right to refuse having their children poisoned with live viral fragments, toxic adjuvant chemicals, and heavy metals, the 95 percent vaccination rate in the U.S. would likely drop significantly.
The Ebola virus mysteriously appeared in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in 1976 and has sporadically reappeared in the area without explanation ever since. Mainstream medical professional believe that eating monkeys who are infected with Ebola is the initial mode of transmission. However this is accepted speculation because the scientific community agrees that the natural reservoir of the virus is unknown and therefore knowledge of transmission is only hypothesized.
Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni made a formal statement warning his citizens: “I therefore appeal to you to be vigilant. Avoid shaking of hands; do not take on burying somebody that has died from symptoms which look like Ebola. Instead, call the health workers to be the ones to do it. And avoid promiscuity because these sicknesses can also go through sex.”
Dr. Paul Roddy, Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF), a French charity, asserts that the outbreak of the Ebola virus in Uganda has been stabilized, however an additional outbreak could erupt in another location. Roddy believes that natives eating bush-meat were the catalyst for spread. He assumes that monkeys who have eaten infected bats, that were then consumed by Ugandans was the chain of infection.
Eight days later, in the DRC, a new strain of the Ebola virus has surfaced according to medical volunteers from MSF. It is not the same strain as was discovered in Uganda.
This new epidemic is being monitored because “not every person who develops the disease will develop clear symptoms that are recognized as Ebola. For the moment it seems that there are not that many cases but the exact number of cases is unknown,” said Anja de Weggheleire, representative of MSF.
Overseen by the US Department of Defense (DoD) under the Transformational Medical Technologies program (TMT) of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have spent millions of dollars conducting scientific research into the Ebola virus, its potential for being turned into a bio-weapon and certain vaccine efforts through two drug corporations, Massachusetts-based Sarepta Therapeutics and Tekmira Pharmaceuticals of Canada . Then the funding was abruptly cut.
The DoD suddenly stopped funding Ebola vaccine research through these two corporations due to financial constraints. With the sporadic nature of Ebola outbreaks, combined with the absolute deadly nature of the virus makes it a hard sell to large pharmaceutical corporations because it “isn’t a huge customer base and big pharma is obviously interested in big profits. So these niche products which are important for biodefense are really driven by small companies,” according to Larry Zeitlin, president of Mapp Biophamracueticals, who is developing therapies to combat Ebola.
Mysteriously, microbiologists and virologists who were involved with research into immunology and bioweapons have either gone missing or found dead over two decades. Some of these scientists had ties to the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the NIH, the DoD – just to name a few. While the number of experts involved in infectious disease research having died under questionable circumstances has risen exponentially, the US government has remained non-chalant.
In November of 2002, DynCorp was given a $322 million contract to develop, produce and store vaccines for the DoD. DynCorp has been connected to PROMIS, a software program designed to identify and target specific individuals for operations known only to the US government.
One of the most shocking calls for depopulation came from Dr. Eric R. Pianka, scientist at the University of Texas back in 2006. Pianka was speaking to an audience of fellow scientists, students, and professors when he proclaimed that 90% of the world’s population needed to be killed using a weaponized form of the Ebola virus. He stated that an airborne version of Ebola would be more effective than the HIV/AIDS virus has been since its release in 1979 because of the speed in which the victim dies.
If Pianka’s nightmare scenario were to be carried out, how could it be done with the most efficiency and impact?
During the hype over possible 2012 Olympic Games terrorist schemes, the Lieutenant Colonel Brian Fahy advised the UK government that it was “feasible” that drones equipped with biological weapons could be remote-controlled and aimed over the skies of London during the Games. Fahy said: “An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) can be put in a backpack. They come in all sorts of sizes and it’s feasible they could be filled with something noxious and flown by remote-control.”
In preparation for the possibility, Elite soldiers wore biochemical suits, gloves and masks during training exercises provided by a top-secret military research facility in Porton Down, Wilshire. Fahy explains: “We have worked up a comprehensive plan to protect against the potential hijacking of a commercial airliner down to slow-moving microlights or radio-controlled planes.”
These drones will be in civilian airspace, with “the potential for invasive surveillance of daily activities,” says House Representative Ed Markey.
Just last June, researchers at the University of Texas demonstrated to officials at the DHS how drones could be hacked into through their navigation systems.
By sending a false Global Positioning System (GPS) signal the drones were tricked into taking a different course.
To infect a large amount of people (like the population of a large US city) with a bio-weapon like the Ebola virus, drones could be used to spray over-head with ease. Because of the immediacy of infection, the population of cities affect would experience a dramatic reduction nearly instantly. In fact, it would take nearly a week for officials to even respond to this type of pandemic and by that time, thousands of Americans would be have succumbed to the Ebola virus.
Because of the effectiveness of the mortality rate of the Ebola virus, it is the perfect bio-weapon. And if combined with the recent implementation of drones in US skies, could this be a combination we should be concerned about?
Globalists like Ted Turner and Bill Gates have already stated publicly that they want a significant amount of the world’s population reduced – even as far as by 90% in the name of climate change and reallocation of resources. How could they accomplish such a feat without the aid of a bio-weapon? And furthermore, how could they ensure that large enough amounts of the population are exposed to the bio-weapon for maximum effect?
Perhaps aerial drones equipped with the Ebola virus would be flown over American cities, then the global Elite could sit back and wait. Once the virus has killed the majority of the population, the next agenda for global governance can unfold.
By Leslie Carol Botha Women’s Health Freedom Coalition Coordinator Natural Solutions Foundation September 2, 2012
Foreign DNA is a term most medical consumers are not aware of. However, common sense alone raises questions about the dangers of foreign DNA – otherwise known as recombinant DNA. The American Biologic Safety Association (ABSA) has classified recombinant DNA a biohazard and has outlined specific directives over the handling of such contaminants.1.
According to a supporting document, written by the Coalition of Vaccine Safety “…The presence of dormant and relict viral sequences in the human and other animal genomes has been known for at least 20 years.These include human retroviral sequences that have been identified in live viral vaccines grown in human cells. 2.
“Victoria and colleagues have identified the contamination of live viral vaccines for use in healthy children, with viral nucleic acids; the findings have since been confirmed by the vaccine manufacturers and the data reported to the FDA. Contaminating nucleic acids include retroviral sequences from the producer chicken and primate cells. Specifically, Avian leucosis virus (ALV) was present as RNA in viral particles while simian retrovirus (SRV) was present as genetically defective DNA. Rotarix, an orally administered rotavirus vaccine, contained nucleic acids from porcine circovirus-1 (PCV1), virus. Since this report, a second rotavirus vaccine (RotaTeq) has been shown to contain nucleic acids from both PCV1 and PCV2, a pathogen in pigs that is associated with wasting and immunodeficiency. The circumstances in which PCV2 induces disease are discussed below.“3.
The Center for the Biology of Chronic Disease (CBCD),* publisher of Dr. Hanan Polansky’s the Purple book Microcompetition with Foreign DNA and the Origin of Chronic Disease explains how foreign DNA fragments can cause many major diseases without damaging (mutating) the human DNA. The book has been read by more than 5,000 scientists around the world, and has been reviewed in more than 20 leading scientific journals. The theory explains the underlying cause of many major diseases and shows how dormant viruses actually can cause disease while still latent.
Dr. Polansky discovered that foreign DNA fragments called N-boxes can cause disease. When these foreign DNA fragments enter the body (naturally, or artificially, like through an injection of a vaccine or other treatments), they end up in the cell’s nucleus, where they attract scarce genetic resources. The “microcompetition” between the foreign N-boxes and the human N-boxes cause the human genes to malfunction, which, in turn, can lead to disease.
In fact, when approached about the HPV rDNA contamination found in Gardasil® – Dr. Polansky agreed that the contaminant should not be there. According to Polansky – the potentially harmful contaminant is part of the faulty biologic medicine manufacturing process that is unable to filter out all foreign DNA plasmids and therefore the particles were suspected to be present in all biologic medicines on the market.
Is the Autism Epidemic Linked to Foreign DNA Particles in the MMR II Vaccine?
In April of this year, the CBCD published a press release4. encouraging the CDC to study Polansky’s Microcompetition Theory since foreign DNA has also been found in Merck & Co.’s MMR II vaccine.5. The vaccine package insert (available for download at the FDA’s web site) shows that fetal cell line Wistar RA 27/3, fetal cell line WI-38, and genetically engineered human albumin are all used in the vaccine.
The CBCD believes that a better understanding of the theory – lauded by many scientists and researchers at NIH, and other esteemed universities and organizations may lead to better policies to curb the Autism epidemic. In a recent CDC report that epidemic has increased by 78% since 2007.
Infants 12 months of age or older, are inoculated with the MMR II vaccine with a second dose usually given around age four or five right before entry to school. According to the CBCD, this is also usually the time that the majority of Autism diagnoses are made.
The release goes on to state:
The CBCD believes that the current purification processes cannot completely filter all foreign DNA plasmids used in the process of manufacturing the MMR II vaccine. Therefore, some foreign DNA fragments end up being injected into infants.
“The MMR II vaccine is contaminated with human DNA from the cell line in which the rubella virus is grown. This human DNA could be the cause of the spikes in incidence. An additional increased spike in incidence of autism occurred in 1995 when the chicken pox vaccine was grown in human fetal tissue,” wrote Dr. Helen Ratajczak, Ph.D. in support of this belief. She published two papers regarding this subject in the Journal of Immunotoxicology. (Merck and Co. Inc., 2001; Breuer, 2003)
However, it appears that the CDC and FDA are aware of the problem with vaccines. In June of 2001, a paper was published in Emerging Infectious Diseases entitled: “Adventitious Agents and Vaccines” stating that:
“Many novel vaccines are produced in animal cell substrates, and emerging infectious diseases may theoretically be transmitted from animals to humans through these vaccines. The challenge of identifying potential adventitious agents in vaccines closely parallels the challenge of identifying the agents causing particular emerging infectious diseases.” 6.
Dormant HPV Infections the Silent Culprit
Although the FDA asserts that the foreign DNA fragments found in Gardasil® poses no risk, the CBCD disagrees. Their research has led them to believe that HPV has the ability to establish a chronic, dormant (latent) infection and it those chronic infections that can potentially lead to cancer.
A recent study entitled “Prevalence of Oral HPV Infection in the United States, 2009 – 2010” that was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) reported that the HPV virus was found in the mouths of 7% of study participants. 5,600 people participated in the study. Oral HPV was found in men more than in women.
The authors of the study wrote, ‘The prevalence of oral HPV infection among men and women aged 14 to 69 years in the United States is approximately 7%… Infection with HPV-16, (a specific type of HPV most associated with cancer) was detected in 1% of men and women, corresponding to an estimated 2.13 million infected individuals in the United States.’
In essence, according to the study, 2.13 million people who don’t have symptoms now, and don’t even know they are infected, could develop cancer due to their HPV infection. 7.
Now add in the rDNA factor and one has to wonder at the mechanisms of action that are actually going on in the body. Dormant DNA – potentially becoming stimulated by the vaccine designed to prevent the chronic infection leading to cervical and other HPV-related cancers – with a mix of rDNA bound to aluminum now circulating in the blood and targeting the weakened areas of the body.
HPV rDNA Particles found in Postmortem Inquest of New Zealand Girl
In August, Dr Sin Hang Lee, a pathologist on the medical staff at Connecticut’s Milford Hospital testified about the discovery of HPV DNA fragments in post-mortem samples of her blood and spleen 6 months after Gardasil®® vaccination at the postmortem inquest of Jasmine Renata, a New Zealand teenager who died in her sleep.8.
Dr. Lee’s testimony stated:
“The finding of these foreign DNA fragments in the post-mortem samples six months after vaccination indicates that some of the residual DNA fragments from the viral gene or plasmid injected with Gardasil® have been protected from degradation in the form of DNA-aluminum complexes in the macrophages; or via integration into the human genome.
Undegraded viral and plasmid DNA fragments are known to activate macrophages, causing them to release tumor necrosis factor, a myocardial depressant which can induce lethal shock in animals and humans.”
Although Dr. Lee’s discovery cannot directly tie the rDNA to the girl’s death, the probable mechanism of action does exist since all other ‘cause of death’ scenarios have been ruled out.
According to Dr. Lee, Gardasil® contains a genetically engineered recombinant HPV DNA inserted into yeast cells. rDNA behaves differently than natural HPV DNA which does not stay in the blood stream for a long period of time.
Once a segment of recombinant DNA is inserted into a human cell, the consequences are hard to predict. It may be in the cell temporarily or stay there forever, with or without causing a mutation. Now the host cell contains human DNA as well as genetically engineered viral DNA. 9.
War of the DNA
The most frightening aspect of all is that government health agencies do not have the testing nor do they have understanding as to what happens when a recombinant DNA particle infects a cell with ‘normal’ DNA.
What are the mechanisms of action that determine who wins the DNA wars? What if the normal ‘DNA’ loses? Are the skyrocketing rates of autism and the increasing Post-Gardasil and Post-Cervarix Syndromes examples of DNA gone bad?
Even more frightening is that scientists do not know how to isolate or even remove the foreign DNA particles from the body. What lies ahead is a crap shoot for medical consumers who are left with a ‘damned if I do or damned if I don’t scenario.’
1. Risk Classification Criteria for World Health Organization, Australia, Canada, European Union (EU), USA CDC/NIH and NIH for RDNA. 2. Biohazard potential for live viral vaccines containing naked or free nucleic acids from contaminating (adventitious) viruses. 3. Viral nucleic acids in live-attenuated vaccines: detection of 1 minority variants and an adventitious virus 4. Autism Epidemic, Is Foreign DNA in MMR II Vaccine Responsible? CBCD Suggests CDC Study Microcompetition Theory 5. Merck & Co. Product Package Insert on MMR II vaccine 6. Emerging Infectious Diseases, Adventitious Agents and Vaccines, 7. Dormant HPV Infections Can Cause Disease Even Without Activating 8. Gardasil® HPV DNA Discovered in Post-Mortem Blood and Spleen Tissue 9. Discovery of Potential Bio-hazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil® HPV 4 Vaccine
The United States Federal government is responsible for funding the efforts of Dutch researcher Ron Fouchier and Japanese researcher Yoshihiro Kawaoka to transform the bird flu into a killer superbug easily transmissable from person-to-person, exponentially increasing the likelihood of a global pandemic.
It is widely accepted that the first case of bird flu in humans occurred in May 1997 when a person caught the H5N1 virus in Hong Kong and ultimately died from the disease. Since that time avian influenza, more popularly referred to as bird flu has been viewed as a looming threat and a likely agent triggering a global pandemic. What most people do not realize is that the world has already been through a global pandemic and witnessed the type of global suffering and catastrophic results an outbreak of bird flu can cause.
The outbreak to which I am referring is the global "Spanish Flu" pandemic of 1918. The name is exceptionally misleading as the virus that killed between 60-100 million people between 1918 and 1920 was a type of bird flu. Patient Zero was an American Solider from Kansas who was shipped off to World War I and took the virus with him. According to an article published in the New York Times in 1995, Dr. Jeffrey Taubenberger located shards of the extinct 1918 "Spanish Flu" virus in the corpses of dead soldiers buried in permafrost. Taubenberger concluded that the virus was in fact a bird flu, and then set about to recreate the virus that swept the globe in 1918. What could possibly go wrong with that? Right.
Dr. Taubenberger and his colleagues were successful in recreating the virus, and found something rather unsettling:
“When he compared the 1918 virus with today's human flu viruses, Dr. Taubenberger noticed that it had alterations in just 25 to 30 of the virus's 4,400 amino acids. Those few changes turned a bird virus into a killer than could spread from person to person."
It seems that the fact there were only a small number of alterations necessary to transform a bird flu virus into a killer superbug easily transmissable from person-to-person caught the attention of a rogue nation firmly in the grip of Satan who appears to be attempting to create the perfect bio-weapon. What rogue Satanic nation would ever conceive of doing something like this that could have such potentially horrific global ramifications? Iran? Pakistan? Russia? If you guessed any of those nations I commend you for a good guess, but the nation to which I am referring is none other than the United States of America.